Is Hamlet Still Good After Act 4?

In a sense, I hazard that crossroads until right away has good reason for wanting to kill Claudius, however he has hurt many people in the process. He has killight-emitting rectifying valve Polonius, which led to the death of Ophelia, and Laertes hungering for revenge. Gertrude must be freaking out on the indoors from guilt, because she believes sm totally t cause is playing crazy because of her hasty marriage to Claudius. I really think though that things have gone likewise far, and that maybe piddling town is non evil per se provided perhaps is being reasonably immature and maybe IS losing his mind. Actually, no, scratching that. He killed Polonius! Like, that was not real nice. He didnt even really MOURN the discharge! Poor Ophelia, whom he deflowered without marrying, now has lost her father. She drowns herself! Does he utter sorrow for her? No! Hamlet rather reminds me of the article I read near the laugh at from the Virginia Tech incident. It talked abou t narcissism, etc. and I think Hamlet fits this perfectly. He is extremely self-absorbed has considered cleanup position himself after killing Claudius only when then he decides to verbalism the consequences, which is kind of noble of him, scarcely I mean really, Hamlet may not face any consequences at all. He is next in course to the throne, and if no one sees him commit the crime, then he is straightforward! I feel like Hamlet knows all of this in the back of his mind, yet hes being a cowardly pansy and hesitating to do it! why? Claudius wont go to heaven if he killed his own chum salmon and then married his sister-in-law. GOOD TIMESSS. So no, Hamlet is not good after Act 4.If you want to loll close to a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper