Reaction Paper on Trust Doctrine on Intergenerational Responsibility

REACTION PAPER ON TRUST DOCTRINE OF INTERGENERATIONAL province by Felrose Lynn V. Acenas We ar poised right at the edge of roughly very major changes on Earth. Maybe it is indeed safe to theorise that we really atomic number 18 a geological force thats changing theplanet. at heart the lifetimes of todays children, scientists say, the climate could reach a state unknown incivilization. Whether we acknowledge it or not, Climate Change is upon us. It is good to know that many of us are active in studying about change and are concerned with the environment.Climate Change is a major problem and various entities most the world are doing their best to address this problem. This is why Trust dogma is proposed, it is for the litigation of climate change issues with an emphasis on the rights of future generations. The familiar faith tenet provides a method whereby environmental rightfulnessyers can bring suit against government activitys on behalf of current and future generatio ns. Deriving from the common law of property, the public trust teaching is the most fundamental legal weapon to ensure that government safeguards natural resources necessary for public welfare and survival.In the place setting of the climate crisis, which threatens the life of innumerable human beings into the future, the public trust doctrine functions as a judicial tool to ensure that the political branches of government protect the basic right to life held by citizens. An ancient stock-still enduring legal principle, it underlies modern statutory law. At the core of the doctrine is the principle that every sovereign government holds vital natural resources in trust for the public. As trustee, government must protect the natural trust for present and future generations.It must not allow irrevocable disablement to critical resources by private interests. In the Oposa Vs Factoran Case, the petitioners, all minors, sought the wait on of the Supreme accost to order the responde nt, the Secretary of DENR, to cancel all active Timber License Agreement in the country and to cease and conclude from receiving, accepting, processing, renewing or approving the new TLAs. They alleged that the massive commercialised logging in the country is causing vast abuses on rainforest.They furthered the rights of their generation and the rights of the generations yet unborn to a equilibrize and healthful ecology. The Supreme Court decided in the Affirmative. Under Section 16, Article II of the 1987 composing it states that The state shall protect and advance the right of the people to a balanced and healthful ecology in accord with the euphony and harmony of nature. uncalled-for to say, every generation has a duty to the next to preserve that rhythm and harmony for the full enjoyment of a balanced and healthful ecology.Put a little differently, the minors assertion to their right to a get environment constitutes, at the same time, the performance of their obligation to ensure the fortress of that right for the generations to come. This is an eye opener, If these minors did their part, how much more those with discernment, and especially those who are legally knowledgeable. We must all remember that we all have an intergenerational responsibility to our future generations.