Should the Electoral College still be in Place Research Paper

Should the Electoral College still be in Place - Research Paper ExampleFurthermore this particular thesis again would look top through history for examples where the electoral system on current values have failed to provide a decision based on the unanimous most favourite votes achieved and and then appoint office a candidate who significantly does not consent the peoples ideology in running the country. Lastly we would succumb to the detail that prior to twentieth century the electoral system of electing the president was made by people who were the pioneers of their judgment of conviction and corporation while keeping in mind the common educational awareness in a single voter and how this method would cancel dysfunctional ballot which may not be in the best interest of the United States. For matters concerning the voting system upheld by the Electoral College, there have been, for the ancient two centuries, excessive debates that primarily highlight the loop holes associat ed with this form of presidential selection. Firstly before startle in to the jargon of as to why the Electoral College of presidential elections deems a misfit in current society we would on first note take up to the fact that what practically is the Electoral system of voting that we all so often refer to. On theoretical counts the Electoral College system of voting to asseverate a new head of the area is a method in which electors from all(prenominal) state variety their votes on potential candidates that seek to become the next president so as such the electors hold the key of who becomes the new subsequent head of the state. The votes casted by the American citizens is only associated with the electors of their own state hence even though votes pertaining to a deoxycytidine monophosphate percent regarding either the democrats or the republicans could only and fundamentally satisfy for their own states electoral representatives (Glennon, Michael J. When Quarterly, 1992). The number of electoral reps that every state acquires is a directly proportional common fig tree to the amount of people or residents residing in it and therefore the number of electoral reps in each state varies from one another. For precedent Minnesota as being a relatively bigger state than capital of South Carolina has seven more electoral votes and hence stands to a 10 to 3 ratio in comparison. The numerate number of electoral votes situated is five hundred and thirty eight and hence to potentially net income an election a candidate must receive more than or equal to two hundred and seventy uncontested votes and effectively claim a winning spot. The voting system in every state apart from Maine and Nebraska has a winner take all methodology on border electoral votes as such if in any state the democratic or republic political party get the majority votes then automatically the other residing votes which may not be in favor of the winning party would also be effectively transferred to the votes of the winning electoral reps. This particular policy has a major drawback concerning the fact that even though a candidate may win the most popular vote of the country it may eventually lose at the mercy of the Electoral college system. Again for instance the nominee from the democratic or republic party gets electoral votes from the majority of states but loses to small margins in larger ones